Unnatural Causes Essay, Part 1
- In a sentence or two state the key argument that the film presents.
The film presents the role of social determinants of social health in the creation of health inequality in the United States. The film explains how the both class and racism can have greater impacts on one’s health outcomes as compared to genetics or personal behaviors. This is based on the fact that, the film presents a series of overarching themes
2. State at least one hypothesis that is tested in the film:
The film tries to carry out the research from Michael Marmot’s Whitehall studies, which hypothesized that health status and wealth correlates on a gradient that is continuous from the wealthy to the poor. in the process of understanding the reason as to why the gradient exist, the film tries to look at the negative impacts of chronic stress, and the provided evidence that states that those individuals found on the lower special spectrum are likely to suffer from toxic stresses. The film outlines stresses increases and control over ones’ life consequences. Decreases as a person as a person moves down the socio-economic ladder, with real health
3. Identify the IV & DV in the hypothesis
IV Wealth DV Health
4. How does this film draw on a sociological imagination to analyses health? How so? Explain
(Draw on an example from the film and discuss how the film challenges “conventional ways of thinking about health.)
Social policy has a lot to do with health. This is based on the fact that, decisions that are made by governments as well as corporations have the ability of making every day benefit to some people while burdening others. Unfortunately, they usually enforce class, racial as well as gender inequities that have been contributing to unequal illness patterns as well as patterns of premature deaths. The point of coming up with a social group that can advocate effectively and efficiently for the so-called equitable social policies is a very important step in changing economic, physical as well as social environments, in a manner that it will be promote rather than threatening people’s health.
This implies that, the process of tackling health inequalities has been a matter of politics that is unavoidable. It engages the struggles over what people want their government to handle resource allocations, corporate power regulation, as well as the implementation of democratic principles. It also involves issues dealing with community empowering and reshaping of institutions in a manner that it will address both social and economic conditions that profoundly shape peoples health.
A clear example is explained by Tony Iton, MD director in the film points out that, social policies that have the ability of producing and reproducing socioeconomic as well as racial inequalities have been for along time taken various forms that even includes “racially restrictive covenants on property economic redlining in banking practices, school segregation, housing and urban renewal policies, disinvestment in public transportation, discriminatory zoning practices, law enforcement racial profiling, incarceration policies, and other deliberate governmental policies and practices.
5. Which theoretical approach, conflict or functionalism, is the most featured in the film? Explain (one or two concrete examples from the film to support your response).
The most featured functionalism in this film is the connection between health bodies, healthy bank accounts and skin color. the film tries to explain the reasons as to why people fall sick in the first place, and the reasons as to why health patterns along with illness underlies the patterns of both class and racial inequalities. The above factors have affected the opportunities of good health. The film outlines that, the rich have accessibility to resources, power as well as opportunities, hence have good health. While those at the bottom are under various stressors like unpaid bills, faces jobs that don’t pay well, living conditions that are unsafe, environmental hazards exposure along with fewest resources.
The results of this functionalism are a health gradient, under which every drop in the socio-economic rank ends up corresponding to worse health. According to Louisville Metro Public Health Department statistics indicate that the gap of five and ten years in life expectancy exist between the rich in the city, middle class and working-class neighborhoods. In addition, racial inequalities add another burden to individuals of color. Experiments with monkeys and human beings have indicated a chronic stress response on how racism and class interacts.