Network neutrality, often known as internet neutrality is the principle which holds that individuals should be allowed to access the internet without prohibiting or blocking any particular websites or products. The issue is related to internet freedom as it requires all people to access everything on the web. The issue is a global problem because not all content is public. Some information requires privacy depending on its elements as well as its source. In this, the opinion of various individuals will help to identify the solution to the issue.
The President of America, Barrack Obama presented his opinion on the issue of network neutrality. In this, he mentioned that good things happen when people raise concerns about them. He meant that individuals should be allowed to view content on the internet, a situation that is likely to lead to an incredible innovation and growth. He also depicted that the internet traffic should be treated equally, enabling companies to obtain the chance to establish and succeed. The President also noted that thousands of people need for the change in network neutrality to enhance the activities of the public and the particular organizations. In this, he also depicted that neutrality is the backbone of the country’s democracy, thus, the reason it should be initiated through advanced activities leading to growth.
Docquir, a researcher of the Belgium Center for Legal Philosophy noted that network neutrality causes numerous challenges to individuals and the public. In this, he noted that the aspect of network neutrality slows down the information and creates congestion on the various websites. The issue becomes a problem as useful information is difficult to access. Besides, companies may not acknowledge the important tips or products that their competitors employ during the production process. The digital traffic blocks the information that circulates on the internet, prohibiting people from accessing. The aspect of congestion does not support the development of the communication platform since much of the information is blocked or slowed down. The author notes that network neutrality acts as a discriminatory treatment against the circulation of content on the internet.
Sura, who is a researcher at freedom works, notes that neutrality is a condition that seems fair to the public eye, even though it is stifling and unnecessary to innovation. He asserts that network neutrality blocks necessary content that would be useful to the large portions of the internet. He also depicts that the large pieces of information available on the web help to advance the competition by service providers. For instance, the various WIFI networks, as well as the phone companies need innovative adoptions, that if, unrestrained, support innovation. In this, network neutrality does not support competition because access to information is limited. Besides, the issue does not support business because only a small fraction of the business owners will flourish as neutrality sweeps restrictions and the web laws.
In conclusion, network neutrality, as reflected in the aforementioned context, reveals the existence of a potential law issue. The aspect of blocked or slowed down information reflects that network neutrality is indeed an existing problem; hence, a suitable solution needs to be investigated. In my opinion, network neutrality needs to be encoded into law to favor the content that is already blocked. In this, the aspect of equality will be evaluated to allow businesses to experiment the pricing models and the different new technologies, which are forbidden by neutrality. The issue will also create the next generation of entrepreneurs if it is acknowledged by the existing law.