Resurrection Recorded by John Essay

In the Christianity religion the resurrection of Jesus refers to the comeback of the bodily life of Jesus Christ three days after His death by crucifixion (Barnes, 1999). This is a key element in the entire Christian faith, beliefs and theology. The resurrection is a certain proof that Jesus is actually the savior of the world, the son of God and Christ.  Let us see the contrast as recorded by the synoptic gospel of John and that of Mathew (Barnes,1999).

Firstly, it only takes the gospel of John to explain the fact that before Jesus died on the cross requested for a means to quench some thirst and to the dismay He was given a vessel full of vinegar. After taking this he said, it is finished, then bow his head and gave up his spirit (Brown, 1970). Then the Jews requested to remove the bodies of Jesus and those of the other thieves from the cross and they pierced the body of Jesus, at once came out blood and water as no bone of Jesus was broken which fulfilled the scriptures. (Jn 19: 30-37 New International Version ). The author emphasizes that that is amount is indeed the truth. This section is not found in Mathew (Brown, 1970).

Secondly, Jesus is unequivocally established as a man of flesh and blood. This is of the utmost importance that his death is verified completely and totally, which would prevent all objections leading to the Christian faith development , to the claims of Jesus’ death and resurrection. In (Jn 19: 34-351) the soldier pierced Jesus’ one side (Barnes,1999). The wound was so deep which suggests that Jesus at this time must have been death as it was one which a man could fit in his fist (Jn 20: 25 and 27) (Barnes, 1999).

Again, John relates incident of Jesus’ crucifixion with the O.T. prophecy where the bones of the Passover lamb were left unbroken as in (Exod 12:46 and Ps 34:20), where the Lord protects the bones of a righteous man that none might be broken. This prophetic relationship is only found in John and not in Mathew (Barnes, 1999).

Furthermore, the roman soldiers established that Jesus was already dead. It is true that they know their job well and that is why they did break Jesus’ legs to hasten death (Brown, 1970). In (Jn 19:35), the insistence that this eyewitness account is true is for the readers to believe as well and the flowing of the blood and water all evidences that Jesus was dead. This truly is deduced in reference to the gospel of John and not in the correspondences of Mathew gospel.

Lastly, John’s gospel has fewer allusions of historic facts as it is in the Mathew. It is for this reason that the record of Jesus’ death and His piercing of the flesh was meant to be taken as historical fact (Brown,1970).

In conclusion, it is there are distinctive points between the resurrection and death of Jesus when you put into consideration the synoptic gospels of John and that of Mathew. This is as per the above citations in reference of the two gospels.